Local government that has primary land use
A. On or before the date an Applicant submits the appropriate Submission Packet to the SHPO/THPO, as prescribed by Section VII, below, the Applicant shall provide the local government that has primary land use jurisdiction over the site of the planned Undertaking with written notification of the planned Undertaking.
Use of the Submission Packet.
(1) For each Undertaking within the scope of this Nationwide Agreement, the Applicant shall initially determine whether there are no Historic Properties affected, no adverse effect on Historic Properties, or an adverse effect on Historic Properties.
The Applicant shall prepare a Submission Packet and submit it to the SHPO/THPO and to all consulting parties, including any Indian tribe or NHO that is participating as a consulting party.
(2) The SHPO/THPO shall have 30 days from receipt of the requisite documentation to review the Submission Packet.
(3) If the SHPO/THPO receives a comment or objection, in accordance with Section V.E, more than 25 but less than 31 days following its receipt of the initial submission, the SHPO/THPO shall have five calendar days to consider such comment or objection before the Section 106 process is complete or the matter may be submitted to the Commission.
(4) If the SHPO/THPO determines the Applicant's Submission Packet is inadequate, or if the SHPO/THPO identifies additional Historic Properties within the APE, the SHPO/THPO will immediately notify the Applicant and describe any deficiencies.
The SHPO/THPO may close its file without prejudice if the Applicant does not resubmit an amended Submission Packet within 60 days following the Applicant's receipt of the returned Submission Packet. Resubmission of the Submission Packet to the SHPO/THPO commences a new 30 day period for review.
Written notice to the public of the planned Undertaking
On or before the date an Applicant submits the appropriate Submission Packet to the SHPO/THPO, as prescribed by Section VII, below, the Applicant shall provide written notice to the public of the planned Undertaking. Such notice may be accomplished (1) through the public notification provisions of the relevant local zoning or local historic preservation process for the proposed Facility; or (2) by publication in a local newspaper of general circulation. In the alternative, an Applicant may use other appropriate means of providing public notice, including seeking the assistance of the local government.
Information to be contained in the notice
C. The written notice to the local government and to the public shall include:
(1) the location of the proposed Facility including its street address;
(2) a description of the proposed Facility including its height and type of structure;
(3) instruction on how to submit comments regarding potential effects on Historic Properties; and
(4) the name, address, and telephone number of a contact person.
Other groups, which should be provided notice for Undertakings
D. A SHPO/THPO may make available lists of other groups, including Indian tribes, NHOs and organizations of Indian tribes or NHOs, which should be provided notice for Undertakings to be located in particular areas.
Comments regarding potentially affected Historic Properties
E. If the Applicant receives a comment regarding potentially affected Historic Properties, the Applicant shall consider the comment and either include it in the initial submission to the SHPO/THPO, or, if the initial submission has already been made, immediately forward the comment to the SHPO/THPO for review. An Applicant need not submit to the SHPO/THPO any comment that does not substantially relate to potentially affected Historic Properties.
Granting consulting party status
F. The relevant SHPO/THPO, Indian tribes and NHOs that attach religious and cultural significance to Historic Properties that may be affected, and the local government are entitled to be consulting parties in the Section 106 review of an Undertaking. The Council may enter the Section 106 process for a given Undertaking, on Commission invitation or on its own decision, in accordance with 36 C.F.R. Part 800, Appendix A.
An Applicant shall consider all written requests of other individuals and organizations to participate as consulting parties and determine which should be consulting parties. An Applicant is encouraged to grant such status to individuals or organizations with a demonstrated legal or economic interest in the Undertaking, or demonstrated expertise or standing as a representative of local or public interest in historic or cultural resources preservation.
Any such individual or organization denied consulting party status may petition the Commission for review of such denial. Applicants may seek assistance from the Commission in identifying and involving consulting parties. All entities granted consulting party status shall be identified to the SHPO/THPO as part of the Submission Packet.
Consulting party entitlements
G. Consulting parties are entitled to: (1) receive notices, copies of submission packets, correspondence and other documents provided to the SHPO/THPO in a Section 106 review; and (2) be provided an opportunity to have their views expressed and taken into account by the Applicant, the SHPO/THPO and, where appropriate, by the Commission.
Note: In the event of a conflict between the advice given in this training module and the rules and policies adopted in the NPA, the text of the NPA governs.
Question
Is contacting the municipality enough to satisfy the public notice requirement of the NPA? Typically when we contact the municipal Historic Preservation Office or Zoning Board, it would then bring the project up at its next public Board meeting. So would that count as public notification?
It is particularly important that the notice advise readers that they can comment on the impact on Historic zoning. As a practical matter, we suggest that applicants specifically mention that they are soliciting comment under the provisions of the National Historic Preservation Act. The Programmatic agreement specifies the following information be included: 1) the location of the proposed facility including its street address; 2)a description of the proposed facility including its height and type of structure: 3) instruction on how to submit comments regarding potential effects on Historic Properties; and 4) the name, address, and telephone number of a contact person.
The applicant will need to assess the adequacy of the notice provided through the zoning process in each situation. When the local process is not adequate the NPA allows for alternative methods of fulfilling the public notice
Question
Should public notice made during a local zoning process make reference to Section 106?
Yes, an applicant should state clearly in any public notice that it is seeking comment under provisions of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act.
Question
Does the programmatic agreement require consulting parties to be signatories of a Memorandum of Agreement? No. Consulting Parties may be signatories, but as specified in 36 C.F.R. 800. 6 (c)(1)(i)(ii), only if they are invited to do so by the agency official.